Hi Gorry, On 22 Apr 2019, at 5:58, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
Scoping and potential use to endorse non-ietf protocols:As a technical question to the Chairs/AD - does the document need to carry some caveat about non-IETF protocols being standardised outside the RFC-series and not making a statement on recommending or otherwise endorsing their use?
As this document is intended for Informational status and not, say, BCP or standards track, I think there is no implicit endorsement. I felt the text was clear that it is a descriptive analysis of various protocols. So, my view is that nothing else is needed. Nevertheless, I’m open to hearing other opinions.
--aaron
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
