I’m not hearing a critical mass of active wg folks wanting an interim.
Seems like we should cancel. Anyone want to argue otherwise?
--aaron
On 18 Sep 2019, at 8:33, Colin Perkins wrote:
Likewise. And I’m also not convinced we’d make good use of an
interim just now.
Colin
On 17 Sep 2019, at 14:01, Brian Trammell (IETF) <[email protected]>
wrote:
I've scheduled over that :(. can possibly reschedule now but would
prefer running another poll.
Cheers,
Brian
On 17 Sep 2019, at 14:46, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote:
Ugh, well it turns out that I’m moving on 9/27 and Zahed has a
conflict. The doodle poll looked pretty good for Monday, 9/23. I
know it’s short notice but are folks still available? If not,
we’ll run another poll for a couple weeks later. Unless someone
wants to chair the interim in our absence...
--aaron
On 9 Sep 2019, at 9:45, Aaron Falk wrote:
Actually, Friday, Sept 27, 11:00 AM – 1:00 PM EDT has the same
availability and is slightly better for me. So, barring other strong
objections (received real-soon-now), we’ll go with that. I’ll
put in the request with the Secretariat.
Are there specific proposals for agenda topics?
--aaron
On 6 Sep 2019, at 11:21, Aaron Falk wrote:
Looks like Mon, Sept 23, 11:00 AM – 1:00 PM EDT is the likely
candidate for an interim. If you want to attend and haven’t
completed the doodle, please do so now.
Thanks,
--aaron
On 5 Sep 2019, at 16:41, Aaron Falk wrote:
We agreed in Montreal that we’d have a virtual meeting in
September. Please complete the scheduling doodle below ASAP.
https://doodle.com/poll/msxgzyrv5b8ess3c
Best,
--aaron
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
