Authors and WG, Considering the IETF last call comments by Eric Rescorla and Christian Huitema I would like to see discussion on the points they bring up. I can understand that addressing this fully could be a very significant change to the document.
I do see the point they are bringing up about the architectural view of how the protocols are used. I get the impression that TAPS does have a small set of viable security architectures and the choices do affect properties seen from the TAPS API level. Also there are details beyond the properties that gets affected by the layering of security and transport mechanisms and what implementation parts you have to trust for the security properties. So discussion of these aspects may be needed. So please discuss how these are addressed. Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Networks, Ericsson Research ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Torshamnsgatan 23 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected] ----------------------------------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
