Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Ready Greetings:
This is an ops-dir review that looks at the operational aspects of any draft. Overall: Thank you for a clear and well-written document. This draft is well written and clear. One minor editorial nitty-nit. One personal plea from the IDR co-chair(WG that maintains BGP), and co-author of BGP (RFC4771). Personal plea: You've clear stated the BGP issue up front. TCP MD5 is bad (due to privacy issues) and TCP-AO is not deployed.. Has the TAPs given any thought to what might be a replacement that could utilize some of the modern TCP. Would any of your co-authors be willing to chat about this issue? The very minor editorial nitty-nit. Would you please check the order of the items in the pre-shared key import (PSKI) [p. 13-14] to see that it is the same order as the table. _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
