Hi Murray, Thanks for the review! You can find an updated version of the document, that incorporates the nits you point out, here:
https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html <https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html> Thanks, Tommy > On Mar 28, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is a really useful summary, especially for people without deep background > in transport security. It'll make a great reference document. > > Section 4.3: > * "Specific" should be "Specifically" > * "They have a dependencies on" -- should be "dependency" > > > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
