On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:28:18AM -0700, Tommy Pauly wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Thanks for the review! You can find an updated version of the document here: > > https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html > > <https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html> > > Responses to your specific points inline. > > > On Apr 9, 2020, at 7:38 AM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > -- Section 1 -- > > Is there any reason why the integrity property of IPsec AH is not mentioned > > ? > > Same also applies in section 2 when "security protocol" is defined. > > Added a note that AH provides integrity.
I note that per https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/ykyUCKWzn9i0jBgHKhIVApJPLJk/ we may not want to be adding new mention of AH. -Ben _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
