I'm OK during the weeek or to skip the next interim, as long as we keep
a couple of weeks clear either side of the IETF "meeting week:, so I
don't end up with the weeks of IETF meetings that happended last time.
Gorry
On 26/05/2020 15:42, Kyle Rose wrote:
Agreed 100%. Leslie and I are also taking the approach for MOPS of an
interim in lieu of trying to cram our remote meeting into the official
single week for no good reason I can tell. We can schedule the meeting
for when it's convenient for participants, and probably also make it
easier for new folks with jobs to clear their schedules for an hour
here or there rather than an entire week at once without the travel
excuse.
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Aaron Falk <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear TAPS working group & ADs,
Scheduling has begun for the online IETF-108 meeting in July.
Should we request a meeting slot for IETF week? Frankly, I can’t
think of a good reason to do so. We’ve been making good progress
with ~monthly Webex sessions and my hope is to continue them.
Trying to schedule a meeting during IETF week will only reduce
availability of participants. Thoughts?
--aaron
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
