We discussed pull requests and issues for the API draft but did not
resolve all of them. There was general agreement that another 1-2
meetings would be required to settle the remaining issues so that the
doc could go to WGLC. Given the tight relationship between the arch,
API, and implementation docs, the group was on-board with taking them to
WGLC separately but revisiting all three afterwards to resolve any
inconsistencies. The group hasn’t focused on the implementation doc
in some time so the goal for the next meeting will be to take a quick
pass on open issues in that doc to prod folks to resolve them and
prepare for more focused discussion when the API doc is settled. Kyle,
Brian, and Martin agreed to do a deep review of the implementation doc
when the time was right (ie, not before the next meeting). The group
also agreed to move to a 3 week cadence for interims to accelerate
completion of the work. Also, there was agreement not to have a wg
meeting during IETF-109 but Brian will give an update in TSV.
| what | where |
| --- | --- |
|Webex | https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps |
| Bluesheet / Notes |
https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-sept-2020 |
| Github Issues | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues |
| Gitbub PRs | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pulls |
Next meeting: Oct 2, 11-13 US ET
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
