On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:21 PM Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree but I’m not going to fight the ADs on this. We know that Anna
> can’t make it.
>
To add to this, I didn't have it in my calendar and didn't find the session
when I went to look for it in the data tracker a few weeks ago, so I
mistakenly concluded we hadn't scheduled a session yet. For good or ill,
that affected my work prioritization and so I didn't get to my deliverables
in time. I've now scheduled that work for later this week.

> I found the Dec etherpad
> <https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/taps-interim-dec11-2020> (apparently it no
> longer works with the port in the URL). Notes from Dec with my commentary:
>
> Brian will do an in-depth review of the implemenation draft
>
> Haven’t seen anything from Brian so I assume this is not done.
>
> Republish API draft before next interim, should inlcude Tommy's PR on
> connection close, Kyle's 1 line PR, and #658
>
> Last published date of API draft is 2 Nov 2020 so this is not done.
>
> Expect to go to WGLC on API when published
> Chairs will close WGLC on arch (Issue #721 text will cause a new rev
> post-WGLC)
>
> mea culpa
>
> Brian will write a blog post for APNIC + IETF blog based on TSVAREA
> presentation on TAPS
> Aaron will send meeting notice for Jan 15 interim
>
> mea culpa^2
>
> We have 4 new PRs and 2 updated issues since the Dec meeting. I’m willing
> to host & run the meeting Friday (and choose a next date at that time) if
> the group wants to meet. You tell me what you want to do.
>
I say go with the Doodle results. I can make any of those times, and will
make sure my work is done before then.

Kyle
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to