And now I’m caught up enough to see that this was already done; thanks! Back to dayjob firefighting, see you all Friday!
Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Feb 2021, at 06:57, Brian Trammell (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Didn’t manage to get this done yesterday. since we’re still in > working-the-queue mode (we’ll be discussing PRs and the working copy) IMO it > makes more sense to publish post-interim, I.e. IETF Monday. > > Sent from my iPhone > >>> On 20 Feb 2021, at 15:22, Kyle Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> My PR had been rebased against the head of master, so I just ff-merged it >> and pushed. Only #728 is left. >> >> >>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 9:06 AM Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> IMO yes, we can merge these two PRs and go ahead. I’d appreciate if someone >>> who’s a little less clumsy than me with the toolchain could do the actual >>> submission (recently, Tommy) - but if need be, I can make it happen too. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> > On Feb 19, 2021, at 6:33 PM, Theresa Enghardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Dear authors of the TAPS Interface draft, >>> > >>> > I just wanted to check in on whether we think we'll be able to publish a >>> > new revision of draft-ietf-taps-interface before the draft deadline next >>> > Monday and the upcoming interim next Friday? >>> > >>> > As far as I can see, there's two outstanding PRs on this draft, which >>> > have had a good amount of discussion and some approvals >>> > (https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/687 and >>> > https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/728). >>> > >>> > Thanks everyone who's been putting work into this! >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > Theresa >>> > >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
