Hi Martin, hi all,

I just had a quick glance at your draft and have two thoughts to offer:


  1.  How is the protocol API different then the taps API? If a new protocol 
already offers the taps API (without the actual flexibility to choose between 
more than one protocol of course), the mapping would be easy.
  2.  I guess you need something like MUD for protocol where capabilities of a 
protocol are described in a unified way. However, maybe the properties we have 
in taps is also more or less what you need…?

Just some spontaneous thoughts. So please consume with care. I just thought 
they could yield some further ideas!

Mirja


From: Taps <[email protected]> on behalf of Martin Duke 
<[email protected]>
Date: Friday, 9. April 2021 at 23:06
To: taps WG <[email protected]>
Subject: [Taps] Fwd: New Version Notification for 
draft-duke-taps-transport-discovery-00.txt

Here 'tis.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-duke-taps-transport-discovery-00.txt
To: Martin Duke <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>



A new version of I-D, draft-duke-taps-transport-discovery-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Martin Duke and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-duke-taps-transport-discovery
Revision:       00
Title:          TAPS Transport Discovery
Document date:  2021-04-09
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          7
URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-duke-taps-transport-discovery-00.txt
Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duke-taps-transport-discovery/
Html:           
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-duke-taps-transport-discovery-00.html
Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duke-taps-transport-discovery-00


Abstract:
   The Transport Services architecture decouples applications from the
   protocol implementations that transport their data.  While it is
   often straightforward to connect applications with transports that
   are present in the host operating system, providing a means of
   discovering user-installed implementations dramatically enlarges the
   use cases.  This document discusses considerations for the design of
   a discovery mechanism and an example of such a design.

   Discussion of this work is encouraged to happen on the TAPS IETF
   mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> or on the GitHub repository 
which contains
   the draft: 
https://github.com/martinduke/draft-duke-taps-transport-<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=01182b34-5e8313e6-01186baf-866132fe445e-4a7967b513112dd9&q=1&e=0a0e0d39-a2e9-4ff3-bfcf-048ae7181df8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmartinduke%2Fdraft-duke-taps-transport->
   discovery.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to