Dear TAPS,
As we're getting ready to put in the session request for IETF 111, I'd
like to propose some changes to our conflict list, which is pretty long
(see quoted email below).
To possibly remove:
- mboned
- secdispatch
- coinrg
To possibly add:
- rtcweb
Any objections?
(I considered "key participant conflicts" for people who have been
attending TAPS interim meetings in 2021, as well as technology overlap
with our mapping docs. But if I have missed something, please let me know.)
Best,
Theresa
On 6/3/21 1:38 PM, Aaron Falk wrote:
On 1 Jun 2021, at 18:23, Theresa Enghardt wrote:
[…]
Our conflict list for IETF 106 was:
Chair conflict: maprg panrg httpbis
Technology Overlap: quic tls tsvarea tsvwg tcpm iccrg coinrg
Key Participant Conflict: irtfopen rmcat avtcore mops mboned
secdispatch mops tsvwg ippm
We're going to update this list. If you are aware of a conflict
that is not on that list, please let us know.
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
