Greetings, all,

As you can see, I finally found time to close out my editorial backlog; thanks 
Anna, Colin, Gorry for the editorial suggestions!

While there are a few other discussions ongoing, I expect those will continue 
at 111 (have fun without me :( ), and I believe we're ready for the 
pre-111-deadline submission of the drafts. LMK and I'll go ahead and turn the 
crank for -arch (which has one minor change: 
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-taps-arch.txt&url2=https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/api-drafts/draft-ietf-taps-arch.txt)
 and -interface (extensive changes, all editorial, including pervasive section 
renumbering due to restructuring early in the doc).

Cheers,

Brian

> On 9 Jul 2021, at 10:00, TAPS WG status robot <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Friday July 09, 2021
> 
> Issues
> 
> ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+0/-25/💬20)
> 13 issues received 20 new comments:
> 
>       • #852 Using Multicast Endpoints (7 by mwelzl, gorryfair, 
> GrumpyOldTroll) API
>       • #865 Should Endpoint Object identifiers be discoverable? (2 by 
> mwelzl, dhobsd) API
>       • #864 Are scoped IPv6 address (and zone indexes in particular) 
> supported? (1 by britram) API
>       • #800 Remove use of the word TAPS? (1 by britram) API editorial
>       • #802 S3.2: Reference to single namespace is unclear (1 by britram) 
> API editorial
>       • #811 S4.2.11. Interface Instance or Type - text clarification needed 
> (1 by britram) API editorial
>       • #843 Where are events sent? (1 by britram) API editorial
>       • #815 S7.3.2.1. - send replies and map responses to their requests (1 
> by britram) API
>       • #753 Nit: Section 3.1: No such protocol… (1 by gorryfair) 
> Implementation editorial
>       • #819 EstablishementError or InitiateError? Both names are used. (1 by 
> britram) API editorial
>       • #791 be more concrete about receiving (1 by gorryfair) API
>       • #672 Perform a final edit pass on all three docs: normalize 
> capitalization/spelling of keywords, formatting, pseudocode syntax, etc. (1 
> by britram) API Architecture Implementation editorial ready for text
>       • #798 S1.1: Definition of Tuple refers to property before it is 
> defined (1 by britram) API editorial
> 25 issues closed:
> 
>       • #801 S3.1.3 Wrong event handler in code exampe API editorial
>       • #846 unified interface to datagram and connection-oriented transports 
> API editorial
>       • #753 Nit: Section 3.1: No such protocol… Implementation editorial
>       • #738 argh unbreak circleci again
>       • #849 API summary does more than summarise API editorial
>       • #851 Scope of the Interface Definition API editorial
>       • #854 Endpoint aliases and protocols API editorial
>       • #843 Where are events sent? API editorial
>       • #850 Can we give the tables names in Appendix B? API editorial
>       • #819 EstablishementError or InitiateError? Both names are used. API 
> editorial
>       • #820 Convenience Functions - options rather than requirements API 
> editorial
>       • #814 S7.1.3.3. Ordered - Default seems to point to wrong Selection 
> Property API editorial
>       • #817 S7.3.3.1. UDP(-Lite)-specific Property: ECN - Motivation API 
> editorial
>       • #807 S4.2.3. What makes Configure Per-Message Reliability special? 
> API editorial
>       • #816 S7.3.2.2. ReceivedPartial Example API editorial
>       • #813 6. Managing Connections - overlapping bullets API editorial
>       • #811 S4.2.11. Interface Instance or Type - text clarification needed 
> API editorial
>       • #805 S4.2 Use of recommended API editorial
>       • #803 S3.2.2: Enumeration is a basic type so the two bullets do not 
> read correctly API editorial
>       • #802 S3.2: Reference to single namespace is unclear API editorial
>       • #799 S2. Very long bullets are hard to read API editorial
>       • #798 S1.1: Definition of Tuple refers to property before it is 
> defined API editorial
>       • #859 When are objects frozen? API Implementation
>       • #812 S4.2.14. Multipath Transport - why different? API
>       • #800 Remove use of the word TAPS? API editorial
> Pull requests
> 
> ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+6/-9/💬4)
> 6 pull requests submitted:
> 
>       • #871 Resolve #872: text disclaiming multicast rendezvous (by 
> GrumpyOldTroll) 
>       • #870 editorial rollup number three (by britram) 
>       • #869 section refactor (by britram) 
>       • #868 More editorial fixes. (by britram) 
>       • #867 Many editorial fixes (rollup 1) (by britram) 
>       • #866 Preconnections are just structs (by mwelzl) API
> 3 pull requests received 4 new comments:
> 
>       • #862 Help UDP fit wrt connection (2 by gorryfair, csperkins) 
> Architecture
>       • #869 section refactor (1 by britram) 
>       • #863 Re-group managing properties & protocol instances (1 by 
> gorryfair) API editorial
> 9 pull requests merged:
> 
>       • #870 editorial rollup number three
>       • #869 section refactor
>       • #856 Editorial nits API editorial
>       • #868 More editorial fixes.
>       • #867 Many editorial fixes (rollup 1)
>       • #866 Preconnections are just structs API
>       • #857 Fixes #812 API
>       • #862 Help UDP fit wrt connection Architecture
>       • #863 Re-group managing properties & protocol instances API editorial
> Repositories tracked by this digest:
> 
>       • https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to