Thanks for the updates. I have started to look into those. //Zahed
> On 9 Mar 2023, at 18:52, Tommy Pauly <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Zahed, > > I’ve updated all three of documents — interface is currently waiting for > manual approval. > > These should address all of your issues! > > Best, > Tommy > >> On Jan 18, 2023, at 9:29 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Thanks for the interface specification. Again, a smooth read for me. >> >> I have files some issues that I would like to discuss and decide before >> moving forward. I have labeled them as “API", “Discuss" in the github, see >> (https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues >> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-5156ba1c43e392d1&q=1&e=7877d9c7-9968-4397-b121-a4c0f23b5978&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fietf-tapswg%2Fapi-drafts%2Fissues> >> ) >> >> I have created one minor comment and nits related issues labeled as “API” >> only. >> >> //Zahed >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
