On 09/06/12 19:08, David Prager Branner wrote: > When a large backup is taking place, Tarsnap shows no signs of life. I've been > using the -v option as a way of making sure it's alive and active. But I > wonder > if there isn't some less time-consuming way of letting it tell me that it's > work > — a slow-updating activity bar or something of that sort.
What do you mean by "time-consuming" exactly? Printing names of files is not exactly CPU-intensive. -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
