On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:16:12 -0700 Colin Percival <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/24/15 11:18, Bob wrote: > > I recently attempted a restore and discovered that my backup didn't > > go down the full directory tree for a couple of items. Is there a > > limit to the depth tarsnap will recurse? > > Not one you should run into. The only limits I'm aware of are the > inevitable ones (e.g., "paths must fit into RAM"). > > Can you reproduce the scenario with `tarsnap -c -v --dry-run` (which > should list the objects which would be archived but not actually > create an archive)? I don't suppose the original archive was created with --one-file-system, and the missing parts are the other side of a file system boundary?
