Hi Shinnok,
On 23 June 2015 at 00:56, Shinnok <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> So what I propose is:
>
> 1. Adding an extra Job specific option, a checkbox, "Include in automatic 
> backups";
> 2. Add --cron option to the application. Upon firing up with that parameter, 
> Tarsnap will execute headless and initiate job backup on all jobs that have 
> the previous option checked, in a sequential manner.
> 3. The user proceeds to create a scheduled invocation of "tarsnap-gui --cron" 
> with his scheduler(system or something else) of choice and at his own 
> preference of interval and cadence.
>
> I'd be the first user of that. I like the simplicity of it and the fact that 
> I don't need an extra daemon to "watch" over stuff for me.
>
> Specific questions:
>
> 1. Does this sound useful for anyone else besides me?

Yes, I like the idea!

> 2. Should I name the parameter --cron differently, maybe something more 
> inviting like --run-jobs or --scheduler?

"Backup schedule", "scheduled backups" "schedule this backup" ?

> 3. Regarding feedback from the automatic backups(failure, insights), for now 
> the application will print everything to stdout and the user is free to 
> redirect it to his log file of choice. But for the future and given that 
> Tarsnap is a sexy desktop application I might add:
>     a) System tray/menubar popup notifications (completion, failure, extra 
> info)
>     b) The ability to open the application to view more details from the said 
> notifications
>     c) Persistent Backup log (this is part of another Idea feature)
>

I'd like all three but option c is a really good idea.

> On a different note,
>
> I have another change that I want to make but first I'd like to probe it 
> against this list:
>
> I'd like to change the default directory for newly generated keys(via the 
> Setup Wizard for now) from the system specific APPDATA ones, which currently 
> are:
> 1. ~/.local/share/ on Linux/BSD
> 2. ~/Library/Application Support/ on OS X
>
> To just ~/Documents. The reasoning behind it is that we shouldn't hide the 
> keys in such obscure places since they are not transient nor expendable, 
> whereas the application's data is. We also invite the user to keep the key 
> safe(on wizard complete), but then provide a path that he's most likely to 
> ignore in first instance and then completely forget about it. Another aspect 
> to consider is that a user should be a bit more careful with stuff residing 
> Documents, rather than some obscure hidden system paths. Think backups, 
> system restore or system reset.

I'd personally prefer the obscure place so I'm less likely to remove
the keys as I'm cleaning up ~/Documents. Don't let me stop you from
your idea, though.

>
> Regards,
> Shinnok



-- 
-------
inum: 883510009027723
sip: [email protected]
xmpp: [email protected]

Reply via email to