I haven't studied tarsnapper's code so I can't tell you exactly what it
does or does not delete.  But I can show you the resulting behavior from my
deltas line (1d 7d 30d 90d 360d) and hopefully explain the results:
$ # current date is 2025-08-15
$ tarsnap --list-archives -v | sort -n -k2,3 | column -t
host/job-20240723-045000  2024-07-23  04:50:00
host/job-20241021-045000  2024-10-21  04:50:00
host/job-20250119-045000  2025-01-19  04:50:00
host/job-20250419-045000  2025-04-19  04:50:00
host/job-20250519-045000  2025-05-19  04:50:00
host/job-20250618-045000  2025-06-18  04:50:00
host/job-20250718-045000  2025-07-18  04:50:00
host/job-20250725-045000  2025-07-25  04:50:00
host/job-20250801-045000  2025-08-01  04:50:00
host/job-20250808-045000  2025-08-08  04:50:00
host/job-20250809-045000  2025-08-09  04:50:00
host/job-20250810-045000  2025-08-10  04:50:00
host/job-20250811-045000  2025-08-11  04:50:00
host/job-20250812-045000  2025-08-12  04:50:00
host/job-20250813-045000  2025-08-13  04:50:00
host/job-20250814-045000  2025-08-14  04:50:00
host/job-20250815-045000  2025-08-15  04:50:00

So starting with "1d", I get daily backups ever day until I reach 7 days on
the 8th.  Then I get weekly (7d) backups until I reach a month (30 days) on
July 18.  Then I get monthly (30 day) backups going back a year.  (My
records stop here.)  tarsnap runs every day at 04:50 and tarsnapper's
algorithm retains only these archives according to the schedule.  I hope
this helps.  I would also add that tarsnapper seems to support a
"--dry-run" option that you might explore.

On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 2:04 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thought of trying that. But I am not sure what it does if it doesn’t find
> any archive on a certain day where a certain delta will lead it to? What I
> am trying to say is, since it is not a very widely used or has
> layperson-proof documentation, I am not really sure how it behaves.
>
> Anyway, so if I have to achieve something like "10h 7d 6w 12m 5y”
> retention and delete the rest, shall I have to set it as
>
> ‘ deltas: 1d 2d 3d 4d 5d 6d 7d 8d …. '
>
> 1d: the GitHub says - this means 24 retentions, right?
> 2d 3d 4d 5d 6d 7d 8d: for 7 days?
> and beyond this basically find 6 day-numbers so that it will cover 6 weeks
> and then 12 day numbers that will cover 12 monthly retentions, right?
>
> (With the assumption that it will not only try to keep the exact archive
> on that exact day/date but one closest such match.)
>
> I have kept ‘ target: "{date}” ‘ because I have 4-5 different prefixes but
> they all backed up the same data set (it’s just because of a change in job
> name). So my assumption was that should work and it will only look at the
> {date} part of the archive names which is what I wanted.
>
>
> On 15 Aug 2025, at 11:17 PM, Chris Leyon <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> I use tarsnapper as well, but only run it once per day so I can't speak to
> a delta of "10h".  I just use the number of days corresponding to the
> duration.  My deltas line is
>     deltas: 1d 7d 30d 90d 360d
> Tweak as needed.  Also my target includes the `name' variable:
>     target: <HOSTNAME>/$name-$date
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 1:14 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Colin, I’ll reach out once it's done.
>>
>> I have ~2000 archives. I likely skipped pruning planning when setting up
>> tarsnap-gui (haven’t reinstalled it on my reset Mac, so not sure if it even
>> supported pruning). I don’t want to keep this many archives — and even
>> re-encryption won’t be fast with so many, even if each archive is small.
>>
>> I saw '--fsck-prune' but it’s not what I thought.
>>
>> Is there a simple way to delete all except something like — hourly:10
>> daily:7 weekly:6 monthly:12  yearly:5?
>>
>> I have 'tarsnap --list-archives | sort' saved (can add '-v' if needed),
>> and since all archive names end in '%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S', I can script
>> something or use an LLM to pick which to keep.
>>
>> I found https://mail.tarsnap.com/tarsnap-users/msg01678.html and had
>> seen the helper scripts section already. So Tarsnapper is available on
>> homebrew luckily, because couldn’t make prunef ‘make install’ happen.
>>
>> But then Tarsnapper uses some retention scheme (i.e deltas) in such a way
>> that I guess I can only use days. So it doesn't work:
>>
>> [tarsnapper’s config.yml]:
>>
>> jobs:
>>   prune:
>>     target: "{date}"
>>     dateformat: "%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S"
>>     deltas: 10h 7d 6w 12m 5y
>>
>> [and then (I will remove dry-run after checking once)]:
>> tarsnapper -c ~/.config/tarsnapper/config.yaml expire --dry-run
>>
>> results in:
>>
>> > tarsnapper.config.ConfigError: Not a valid delta: 12m
>>
>>
>> PS. Any easy way to search across https://mail.tarsnap.com/tarsnap-users,
>> other than opening every link one by one?
>>
>> > On 15 Aug 2025, at 3:07 AM, Colin Percival <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 8/14/25 11:04, [email protected] wrote:
>> >> I *have to* change my tarsnap key (or rather, stop using the old key).
>> >> I see this https://www.tarsnap.com/tips.html#copy-archive as well but
>> I don’t really understand what it is and what it does - but I don’t see a
>> key mentioned in the command so I guess not like “restic copy”.
>> >
>> > Right, that's for copying one archive, using the same keys and within
>> the
>> > same archival space.
>> >
>> >> This https://www.tarsnap.com/man-tarsnap-recrypt.1.html seems to be
>> the only way, right?
>> >
>> > Yes.  That creates a new archival space, copies everything across, and
>> then
>> > deletes the old copy.
>> >
>> >> Also, the original/existing key was not *passworded*, can I generate
>> the new key as ‘--passphrased’ and then proceed with the recrypt? I am
>> asking because I believe to re-encrypt, ‘tarsnap-keyregen’ has to be used
>> and the key is derived from the old key.
>> >
>> > Correct.  To be more precise, the chunking parameters are kept from the
>> old
>> > key but everything else is generated anew.  (The chunking parameters
>> need to
>> > be kept so that new data will deduplicate against the copied data.)
>> >> This also raised the question - does it render the old key useless
>> after the re-encryption is done, or both keys have access now?
>> >
>> > Both keys will work but they'll access different archival spaces (and
>> the
>> > old keys will point to an archival space with no archives after recrypt
>> > deletes everything using the old keys).
>> >
>> > If this is a "keys were stolen" scenario then let me know and I can
>> disable
>> > the old keys.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Colin Percival
>> > FreeBSD Release Engineering Lead & EC2 platform maintainer
>> > Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly
>> paranoid
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to