Yak,
I have thought about it, but not much and not often, at least not
until recently. I have been told on a number of occasions that I
"should" do it and the answer usually to my "why" question is
inevitably the same thing...because I could make $$$ with it. Well,
while that may be true, I don't see that as a good reason. No, I'm not
being holy and pure of motive and I definitely could use the money,
but it's the same reason I've never put out a solo recording
project...I just don't see that I have any sort of "vision" or that it
needs doing enough to put the effort into it, not until recently. I am
in the process of seriously going about getting the recording underway
and I have been thinking that I probably should go on and finish
transcribing all of Monroe's output (about 750 cuts, and that's not
counting the hundreds of live cuts that are worth considering) and
make a "complete recorded works transcriptions" collection and be done
with it. Nobody else is going to do it and I think it seriously needs
doing. Some of this stuff is damned near impossible to write out due
to the "performance art" (to use a Matt Combs term) involved. Butch
Baldassari got a start on it with the "16 Gems" book. The
transcriptions there are accurately represented. I've read through
others that weren't in the ballpark.

I think it takes a lot of listening over and over and over to get an
ear for this stuff and I really don't see that most people either "get
it" or even care to, primarily because Monroe is old-fashioned by
today's standards and not hip. I hear sounds in his playing now that I
didn't hear years ago. I think a person has to learn "how" to listen
to Monroe. The culture we're in is far removed from Bill's, more all
the time, and it takes going on a journey to get back there. We're for
the most part influenced by electric guitars and not fiddlers like
Bill's generation was. So, it's not nearly as easy for us to interpret/
understand what that old mandolin style is about. It takes a lot of
listening and learning. Sort of same situation as Mike Hoffman's
friend/mentor Frankie has put himself in to learn what's going on with
the black string band tradition as far as I can tell. It takes a
helluva lot of time and energy and love to get in the ballpark and
even then, it's an imitation of the real thing.

I shudder to think that I'd go to all that work to put out a
collection of notation/tab as extensive as that, that I thought was
worth investing the time and energy into to get done right only to
have every other armchair critic on earth start popping out of the
damned woodwork just to shoot a few arrows into it, or to have
somebody in the family or a publishing/copyright person come up and
say "Hey, wait a minute, you can't do that unless you gimme part of
it". I think I'd lose it. I know this is way more than a "yes or no"
answer, and I do realize your question was about MY take on the tunes,
but I figured I should go on and answer in full. As for the
instructional DVD, there was some brief amount of talk years ago about
doing something on Homespun, but that fell by the way. I have had a
few conversations in the past couple years with reputable people about
the DVD idea and I think that there is an avenue I'd like to pursue.
But all of this involves expenditures of cash. I don't really have it
to spare.

Okay, I'll shut up.
Tater



On Oct 16, 9:24 pm, Mandoyak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you ever considered putting out an instructional book/tab/
> notation/semiphore/cd/dvd of your take on Monroe tunes (instrumentals
> I mean...preferably some of the more obscure ones...not to ask too
> much...)?
>
> Just curious. I for one would buy it right quick.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Taterbugmando" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to