Funny.
I had a similar thing last night whilst trying to play a solo that made any
sense at all on a song I had written. In the end I went back to playing a
shuffle on the chords and it sounded just much better: tone and rhythm are
enough to do it


On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Linda <[email protected]> wrote:

> cool story
>
> On Apr 21, 4:59 am, mgromkey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just had another an object lesson in all of this, including how
> > soloing intersects with adding mandolin to a contemporary, non-
> > bluegrass tune.
> >
> > I was asked to record a solo for a local artist's tune. It's an
> > acoustic guitar tracked about four times with some delay and reverb
> > added, electric bass, some tasteful drumming and percussion, and the
> > vocal. I don't know what to compare it to but a female version of Dave
> > Matthews. Lots of driving rhythm guitar. The engineer emailed me an
> > mp3 to rehearse with. I imported it into Logic the laptop recording
> > software I use, and had at it the night before going in to do my
> > take.
> >
> > First, I just tried pure improv -- just jamming along. It was really
> > nice to record myself, because I was able to play it back and see how
> > badly it sucked. Nice to see that I can play fast, but not a solo that
> > went anywhere. No, not good at all.
> >
> > Then I fell back on The Manifesto. I cycled through the tune playing
> > rhythm enough time to get the chords down. Then I thought: Time to
> > learn the melody. And guess what? There really wasn't much melody! The
> > lyrics are mostly sung on the same note as the chords. And then I
> > realized -- again -- that the reason rock guitar solos don't follow
> > the melody is they often have to invent a melody to play, so they're
> > not going (single note) G-G-G-G C-C-C-C G-G-G-G.
> >
> > So instead of improvising (which I really like to do), I made up my
> > own little melody over the chords, including some good old fashioned
> > bluegrassy tremolo. It sounded a lot better.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Taterbugmando" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<taterbugmando%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Taterbugmando" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<taterbugmando%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Taterbugmando" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en.

Reply via email to