I think it would be wise to keep the current selection. There is a good argument for making the new selection, but, as you say it would break the connection process between the previous one and the new one.
Paul. Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 17:14, Paul Fisher > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd prefer to just get on with using it to be honest. >> If i wanted to rename it, i could always right click (now that it has >> been added), and choose to rename the processor. >> > > When discussing this we also realised that when you add a new service > it does not get selected - so in some workflows you would have to hunt > around to see where it is. > > Should we possibly also select the new processor? We can add that when > we do the Service palette revamping. > > The disadvantage with that solution that you would loose the old > selection - which might be the service you wanted to connect the new > service to.. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/taverna-hackers Developers Guide: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/usermanual1.7/dev_guide.html FAQ: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/Mygrid/TavernaFaq
