On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 14:03 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > The disadvantage of a new version would be that it would no longer be > almost directly corresponding to the perhaps better known Apache > contribution license, I guess that the ACLA has been pounded upon by lawyers, so there must be some sense behind it. And just as an example, if you left out the "sell" bit, you'd have some code under old CLA that can be sold and others under new CLA not ...
> but the upside is that we can make it less > lawyer-like in the language and easier to understand.. > Any views..? What about a FAQ for potential contributors in non-lawyer speak ? You could start putting the answers to my questions there, which were quite informative so far. Yours, Steffen P.S.: Yes, I did find the LGPL statements by now :-) -- IPB Halle AG Massenspektrometrie & Bioinformatik Dr. Steffen Neumann http://www.IPB-Halle.DE Weinberg 3 http://msbi.bic-gh.de 06120 Halle Tel. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1470 +49 (0) 345 5582 - 0 sneumann(at)IPB-Halle.DE Fax. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1409 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/taverna-mailing-lists/ Developers Guide: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/developer-information
