Alan Williams wrote: > Wei Tan wrote: > >> I would like to resend this post in case anybody know the answer. >> Thanks, >> >> Wei >> >> Wei Tan wrote: >> >>> another question is that, the code which defines the activity does not >>> know the exact name of the activity instance in the workflow >>> definition file >>> > > I think that is deliberate. As far as I know the enactment of the > activity is not meant to know anything about its context. It only knows > its configuration and the values on the input ports. > > I think you would need to alter the configuration of the activity to > pass in the information you want. To be able to do that you probably > need to alter part of the dispatch stack so that it altered the > configuration of the activity before it was called. > > Hmm, I guess it is a build-time issue rather than a run-time one? To make it simple, the new activity serves as a input for a WSDL activity, so it needs to know which WSDL activity it connects to. (mostly it connects to only one WSDL activity)
Thanks Alan! Wei ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/taverna-mailing-lists/ Developers Guide: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/developer-information
