On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 06:18, Egon Willighagen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there any special reason for using this set up, instead of just > putting all element in the same > "http://taverna.sf.net/2008/xml/plugins"; namespace? I generally agree with you and favour always having a namespace and having it on all elements in the document. However, in this case I wanted to make the XML easier to write by hand, and not every developer is familiar with XML namespaces. As I said it should also work if you did just: <plugins> <plugin> ... </plugin> </plugins> To allow XMLBeans to deserialise both this and the namespaced version (which can also hint at the XSD) I needed to make the element form unqualified. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/taverna-mailing-lists/ Developers Guide: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/developer-information
