On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > Why we are worried about using the taverna-hackers list is that it > might become a bit noisy for those here who are mainly interested in > developing services for Taverna, making Taverna plugins and > integrating Taverna with other products. Such readers might be more > interested in the odd announcement and discussion, but perhaps not on > discussions such as whether to go for Eclipse Extensions or OSGi > Declarative Services.
Both a separate list as well as everything on this list sounds good to me. If people use good subjects for the emails, it should be OK to have just one list. You could consider adopting some scheme where design issues get prefixed by people, e.g. "[OSGi-design] foo bar"... Egon -- Post-doc @ Uppsala University Proteochemometrics / Bioclipse Group of Prof. Jarl Wikberg Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/ Developers Guide: http://www.taverna.org.uk/developers/
