On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 08:41, Andreas Truszkowski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 01.09.2010 16:02, schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes: >> >> I'm sorry, it turns out I was wrong. It is only for *output* ports you >> can specify granular depth. >> >> So I'm afraid you will have to decide to receive it as depth 0 or depth 1. >> >> But you cannot return an empty hashmap for iterations you 'skip' - as >> the nested workflow would never finish, it has only received a value >> for position 15 on output ports Reactant_1 (and Reactant_2), but is > To do looping, select a processor you want to loop, go to > Details->Advanced and select 'Add looping'. A dialogue should let you > test the loop condition on one of the output ports. The processor will > be invoked again until the output satisfies the test.
Can this perhaps be worked out as an example workflow on MyExperiment.org? Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Post-doc @ Uppsala University (only until 2010-09-30) Proteochemometrics / Bioclipse Group of Prof. Jarl Wikberg Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/ Developers Guide: http://www.taverna.org.uk/developers/
