>> The beanshell is >> supposed to be easily extendable with new ports. >> > If you added something into the list of ports (which doesn't exist) > within the beanshell script, then they would not appear as ports of > the service, unless something else was done. > > What is the problem you are trying to solve? A beanshell doesn't > sound like a viable solution at the moment. > > We have a bunch of workflows containing web services that provide several outputs. For example "resultFile" and "successMessage". Those names and the number of the outputs are varying. I'm trying to use a beanshell to store these results to a file server using HttpClient. Till now, I couldn't find a better solution (see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4C2CC6B7.40200%40cs.man.ac.uk&forum_name=taverna-hackers).
Dennis >> Regards, >> Dennis >> > Alan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > taverna-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk > Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/ > Developers Guide: http://www.taverna.org.uk/developers/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/ Developers Guide: http://www.taverna.org.uk/developers/
