On 03/04/2012 09:53, Marco Roos wrote: > Hi Alan, Hello Marco,
> Maybe we can give some feedback before the meeting. Could you send us, > and in particular Reinout (on cc), a list of features that you are > thinking of supporting? The issues I know of can be broken down into four main areas: 1) Limitations caused by the version of Axis a) How/if to deal with the WSDLs that can be generated. The current service has limitations, such as not dealing with "any" and same-named objects. Should we try to change to a different underlying system? If so, what? b) Support for MTOM. c) Support for uploading of attachments. 2) Handling of more semantic information a) Support for SAWSDL b) Additional benefit of semantics on other parts of Taverna? 3) XML splitters a) They are not user-friendly and something much better could/should be done. b) Does this problem go away with components? 4) Streaming a) It is possible to "intercept" the incoming message so that not all of it is read into Taverna in one go. This was done for Taverna 1. A similar concept could be re-introduced for Taverna 3. The skype chat will probably be more of a "brainstorming session". Are there any other major issues? What solutions could be found? Who is interested in working on those areas. > As you may know, Reinout is our main Web Service developer. He can > perhaps give you some useful feedback on the list. Yassene may also give > some feedback, I suppose ([email protected]). Any feedback is more than welcome. > Cheers, > Marco. Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/ Developers Guide: http://www.taverna.org.uk/developers/
