Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > If we are talking about more the conceptual idea of a workflow your > approach could be useful - where one does not expect the loaded > workflow to run immediately, but to be some kind of starting point > which needs some tweaking. > > That was my thoughts on it. I wouldn't expect a direct translation to work, but I would expect it to pull out services and connections. If I have these, I could then 'tweak' the workflow to make it work in the other systems. It would save me 'some' time in transferring them, but, it's not the end point.
Like Taverna's open type system, I was thinking of a super generic language. Paul. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ taverna-users mailing list [email protected] [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/taverna-mailing-lists/
