Hello Peter,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000 19:03:51 +0200 GMT (23/09/2000, 01:03 +0800 GMT),
Peter Steiner wrote:
PS> I do indeed - but as Christian told, it doesn't matter. And what would
PS> be the main purpose for %ReplyCounter? To re-enable what was disabled
PS> in some default template with %SingleRe...
Yeah, doesn't seem to make sense. Only one tempalte is used in any one
message, so it would have to contain both macros.
when the macro %ReplyCounter was suggested a few months ago, and
subsequently implemented, I thought is was meant to substitute the
%SingleRe macro as such as the default would be set to %SingleRe. I
was mistaken.
PS> I think it's a bug. But i don't use this macro, so it doesn't bother
PS> me. And there are things that bother me and are promised for V2...
A point of convenience (usability) rather than a bug, I'd think. ;-)
Since all my templates now contain the %SingleRe macro, it's of no
urgency to me either.
--
Cheers,
Thomas. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.46d
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using a Celeron 366 MHz, 128MB RAM
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
