Hello Vili, On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:50:28 -0400 GMT (28/Sep/10, 0:50 AM +0700 GMT), Vili wrote:
>> VŠ> Bad cert is not The Bat!'s fault. And providing an option to bypass >> VŠ> that, is a security risk as explained numerious times on this list. >> Right. So I'll lose the customer because TB! doesn't allow me to >> override the security issue. >> You must be quite unaware of business reality to say something like >> this. To tell you the truth: It needs to be *my* decision whether I >> accept an unsecure cert. Anything else will make me look for another >> email client, this nannying is just not acceptable. V> I totally agree with Thomas. TB is not user friendly when reporting V> errors, warnings. The error should be put into the face of the user, V> suggest him a solution and allow him to bypass this kind of V> certificate security issues if he wishes. I had customers who had the V> same error. Not fun to explain them that "believe me, it is for your V> own good that you cant send emails". Thanks for your support and making it clearer from your experience that what I say is not only theory. V> We can start an academic discussion about it. At the end what matters V> is the result. Can or cant I send an email. Everything else is just V> waste of time. You dont want to hear the details about all parts of V> your car, it should just run. ACK. I think everything has been said and it is now up to Ritlabs to decide whether they want TB! to be successfull in the future. There is a lot more competition out there than there was when they started. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.36.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
