Hello Maxim,

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:09:36 +0300 GMT (29/Sep/10, 22:09 PM +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:

MM> You  can  use  stunnel (www.stunnel.org) to send your message.

Of course I won't do suich a thing. I want an email client with which
I can send messages without having to install second software to
bypass a "feature".

MM> Stunnel ingores the errors, while you send to stunnel via regular
MM> connection. A sophisticated user will send via stunnel without a
MM> problem. For the user who is unaware about these matters and is
MM> unable to configure stunnel, it's good that The Bat! won't allow
MM> to send via a wrong (and probably compromised) SSL servers. That's
MM> why our core users value us: the system administrators put The
MM> Bat! to their users and can sleep well. The users won't send a
MM> message to a compromised servers. This is the unique trait of The
MM> Bat! and we don't want to loose this niche.

You will probably lose the customers that decide to buy an email
client for their own use, even though some decision makers that buy
the client for their staff's use may be happy about that feature. I
don't think that all those customers will agree that this setting is
hard-coded, though. You won't lose that niche if you  give them the
option, I'd think.

That said, I agree with the option being somewhere in the settings.
Vili has said everything very well and I agree with him. 

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.36.4
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to