Dear Manfred, On Thu, 3 May 2001 09:51:53 +0100, you wrote : ME> I would postpone your tests as IMAP support is still very rudimentary. ME> If one looks at Becky (sorry folks) their IMAP support looks a lot ME> like what you're looking for. I checked and tested Becky (sorry folks) during all this afternoon, version 2.05 to be precise. Their IMAP support is *excellent* and deserves 3 stars, maybe 4. If only The Bat! had Becky's IMAP4Rev1 support, I could declare my quest ended. Please RITLabs hear my pray ! I'm so missing IMAP in my day-to-day migration around 3 work-places that I will most probably buy a license (about 40 USD I think) for Becky just to have something perfectly decent to work with while The Bat evolves. (No I will not come back to Outlook Express, even paid for). I had also paid a license for The Bat, so that's fine, I'll keep an alert eye to this list and jump in for some more testing later. For POP3 connected people, The Bat! stays, in my very personal opinion, far above all others including that Becky. But for IMAP, it has to learn (and will do I'm sure :-) ! Yours, -- Olivier Mascia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- -- ______________________________________________________ Archives : <http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : [email protected]
