Title: Re: 8.6.0.21
Hello Gleason,

Monday, December 17, 2018, 3:06:01 PM, you wrote:


Viktor,

> Hello Gleason,

> Sunday, December 16, 2018, 3:27:53 PM, you wrote:
>>> The splashscreen is nice, honestly - but it doubled the EXE size? Hmm!
>> It doesn't seem to matter, unless you are short of ram.  The days of super expensive memory are gone.
> This is the unfortunate thinking of today. Just multiply that with
> 20 programs and you'll see where it gets you in terms of # uselessly wasted RAM.
> Similar with Android these days: every meaningless "App" eats its
> 60 MB of memory whether it's doing anything or not, totalling to 100% memory usage
> and laggy phone. Just because "memory is cheap" and other lazy programmer thinking.

I wouldn't accuse Maxim of being lazy.  In my case, with TB running, I am using 3.68 gb of ram out of 12.  With TB closed
Me neither. But then it's not him being quoted as "It doesn't seem to matter". It does, on larger scale, anyway.


I am using 3.5.  I guess I'm not feeling overly impacted.  12 gb of ram is not especially high end these days.  
This may be the source of the mistake. Your computer doesn't seem to be
doing much. And TheBat! is not the only program people run.
In my case, out of my 16GB, Firefox feels free to eat anywhere all the way
to 8, Thunderbird takes several gigs too, on bad days, Eclipse is no fly
weight either.
It's so easy to fill all the available memory with one program "because it looked OK on my machine".




And, once again, thanks Maxim for the high quality tastefully done images.  I bet it took some effort to acquire them.
I'm sure. And I'm sure there are better places for >32MB of temporary graphics.




> The days of chasing every kilobyte are gone, but just doubling the
> program between minor versions sound strange to me too.

Unless you understand how that happened.  In this case, the images will be gone when this year's Christmas version is retired.
If the Christmas graphics is what inflated the EXE to twice its size. I, to be honest, didn't even expect that.




> BTW., this is a plaintext list, if nothing else then by custom.
> Would you mind replying to plaintext mails in in plaintext? Yeah, another "old times"
> legacy. But it also eases quoting - or much more doesn't kill it for TheBat! like HTML mails do.

Sure, I was too lazy to think about it.  I remember the years of various email client users railing against the
useless creeping incursion of html into email.  Pegasus, Becky, many others.  It seems that Sylpheed is the last holdout
of any significance.  Change marches on, your perception of whether it is progress or not will vary.
You can see the results for yourself: Try to reply to your own (or, rewriten in original HTML reply form to serve as an example, this very) mail in TheBat! How does the qouting look? How are the levels colored, how well will the footer be handled?

--
Best regards,
 Viktor Kabelac                            
mailto:[email protected]
 
________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 8.5.8.5 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to