At Thursday, May 17, 2001, 2:53:28 AM, Nick has said the following text: > MaXxX, were you not the one who was demanding bug fixes *before* > introducing new features? What on earth would move Developer's to try and > come up with such an outlandish macro as you describe without first fixing > some of the still outstanding bugs? > - - GPG/PGP bugs I outlined earlier > - - bug where your reply becomes mixed up with a newly incoming message > - - PGP support for v7.x > - - Many others reported that remain outstanding Did I say "get to my new macros as soon as possible" ??? I just thought that they might look nice in the Wish List, and before I send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I though that maybe I should get the testers' opinion on it. OF COURSE the bugs are the first to be taken care of!! :) -- Aural Sex produces eargasms. |\ /| \~~~/ \~~~/ WWW: http://maxxx.ii.com.pl (ancient) | \/ | /\ > < \~/ > < E-M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (no spam please) |____| /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\ ICQ: 3146019 (currently inactive) Flyin' high with The Bat! v1.53 Beta/5 over the swamps of Windows NT 5.0 build 2195 -- ______________________________________________________ Archives : <http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
