Hei, David van Zuijlekom wrote: GE>> Well, I think we should never tell people how to do things. If one wants to GE>> delete the attachment (you can chose delete from the menu and you're asked GE>> for confirmation) then it should be deleted. No matter what you think if GE>> this makes sense or not. > Ok. You may have a point there. This was nothing against you! But people work in different ways. Nick A. wrote this wonderful sentence: | Yes I could, but then I wouldn't be using TB! the way I like, and a way in | which TB! is designed to be used. > But then you could enable store the attachments 'Separate from the > messages in a special directory'. Then TB! will store the messages in > the directory you specify and you will have no duplicate attachments. > Or do you already have this enabled? No (I thought the official recommendation in this list was not to store attachments this way?!). The problem with this method is that attachments are stored in one folder. I remember working in the print business where I received sometimes 20-30 pics or files a day which had to be stored in different folders. I had to decide individually on each mail where to store the attachments. I can actually understand the workflow of the guy who brought this up in the newsgroup. Then keeping an 'empty' message with the headers is a good way to 'prove' when mails arrived. -- Regards, G�nther German TB! faq, and cut.exe - delete ads in mails http://www.guenther-eisele.de/bat/ TheBat! 1.53 RC/2, Windows NT 5.0 -- ______________________________________________________ Archives : <http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : [email protected]
