Hello MaXxX, 

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 at 10:36:02 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
M> :D  No offense :P

Absolutely none taken! ;-)

M> I meant that if I wanted my subjects to be more informative, I'd
M> rather reply to a "Subject: Bug report..." mail in a "Subject:
M> Confirmed! (Bug report...)" way, so that my subjects would mean a
M> bit more than just "about the subject", and thus be a bit more
M> informative (that is, extended with a one- or two-word summary of
M> what I wrote).

Ok, I think I got you.. i.e.

Original SUBJECT : Bug report - Cows don't come home.
Your reply SUBJECT: Confirmed - Bug Report - Cows don't come home.

And all the following replies just leave the SUBJECT the same as yours
unless someone has an unconfirmed. Hopefully though, the unconfirmed
would be in reply to the original like this:

Unconfirmed - Bug report - Cows don't come home

instead of:

Unconfirmed - Confirmed - Bug report - Cows don't come home.

The former is perfectly fine by me, the latter could potentially get
very confusing. What do you say fellow mods?


Cheers,
Leif Gregory 

--  
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor  /  ICQ 216395  /  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ   <http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html>

Using The Bat! 1.53 RC/5 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A  
on a Pentium III 500 MHz notebook with 256MB.

Tagline of the day:
A bunch of bunnies hopping backwards:  a receding hare line.


NetZero Platinum
No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
http://www.netzero.net
-- 
______________________________________________________
Archives   : <http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to