-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This message: 23/09/2001 18:32 GMT.
Hello Thomas,
A reminder of what Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
23 September 2001 at 22:48:34 GMT +0800
TF> The way I see it now, in beta/9 the sender's address must be in the AB
TF> in order for the sig to be valid, while presence in the AB is not
TF> necessary in previous versions.
TF> Does that sound right?
No, not here. I imported a certificate and the senders signature now
shows as valid. I have not added him to my address book.
His certificate just shows up in the intermediate CA book. I can see this
entry in the CA book in Beta9 but I can't see my own certificate entry in
my main address book.
I'm getting a bit confused by it all. Some say it's a bug in B9, others
say it's not. Some say the signature has to be imported to appear valid,
others say it appears valid without importing it.
I'm going to install OE6 (Just for experimental purposes!) and download a
few signed email with that to see how that reports them. Need a few of
you to sign them though.
Any chance of a few others singing with S/MIME so I can see what occurs.
I've only had Kevins signature to play with.
- --
Best regards, Tony. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/9 S/N A27A5E65
Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iQA/AwUBO64f/LjPCx4CVaFKEQJlgwCdEwxr4ryIW1Esl5vz1JwMr1TzPWkAoMM8
dZs9Geps8QCUduZF6+pjndlV
=90I/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
