Hello Tony! On Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 10:22:45 AM you wrote:
> A reminder of what Markus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on: > 20 February 2002 at 12:45:14 GMT +0100 Seems, I am on a kind of war path today. Sorry for that. I know that I am the first and foremost to speak up for electronically signing e-mail. Due to some discussions a while back I decided to not PGP sign my messages to these lists - too many people considered it superfluous and annoying. PGP's advantages over S/MIME have been considered several times (including smaller sigs), so I won't go into that again. But what begins to unnerve me is the mass of "Invalid Signatures" with S/MIME. Considered also that S/MIME sigs add considerable overhead to messages (and AB's to view them correctly) could we go back to use S/MIME only for testing purposes as was once suggested by Marck? -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.54 Beta/41 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C No one is injured save by himself. (Desiderius Erasmus) -- _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com BugTraq : https://bt.ritlabs.com/
