-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
@ 12:40:43 +0100 [ Tue, 12 Mar 2002], Dieter Hummel [DH] thoughtfully
wrote the following:
...
>> I get the distinct impression that it's specifically the Ritlabs
>> server bandwidth that they're concerned about and not just bandwidth
>> in general.
DH> Which is important enough when you have to _pay_ for bandwidth.
DH> I have to pay $100-150 additional for bandwidth each month. Thus
DH> considerung to lower bandwidth is essential to save some money.
I have no problem with this as such. I just made the comment in light of
so many complaining that Ritlabs is not saving *them* any bandwidth.
Ritlabs is concerned about only *their own* bandwidth. This is why beta
testers having to download another application to use the beta goes down
OK for them.
- --
____________________________________
Allie C Martin (_ List Moderator and fellow end user
______________________) TB! v1.54 Beta/47 & WinXP Home Ed.
PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
ŻŻ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAjyN7L4ACgkQV8nrYCsHF+LF+gCgvLei72+LlO0I+rcbjBNVUrei
5CYAoLf5Mx7X9GCSAAogPkr5//YURMby
=RZhD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
_________________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List : https://bt.ritlabs.com/
BugTraq : https://bt.ritlabs.com/
