-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Hirning [DH] wrote:
DH> Just wondering what everyones thoughts are on the latest version DH> of Becky...??? I tried Becky and find it to be an interesting, functional client. My main problem with it is that I can't browse multiple folders concurrently. This limitation affects me like a brick wall. It just gets in my way and was the reason why I stopped testing it. The filtering is limited though most would be satisfied with it's current capabilities. I've been spoilt though and enjoy TB!'s superior filtering. Becky's editor is more contemporary and more functional than most Windows based e-mail client editors. I, however, *much* prefer TB!'s. I think TB!'s current editor is more suited to e-mail composing than most contemporary editors. Becky just strikes me as a shadow of TB! (though not a fleeting one). Each major feature or design that is meaningful to me is similar but not as advanced as TB!'s. So Becky is certainly not rubbish. It's just not as powerful as TB!. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAj0a5xgACgkQV8nrYCsHF+KoVgCgs8q+ZOliicMyfxBsG6Bz2GPR BIwAnRB2yCv+RbrEsoDyAmI0UlTXoq4p =Z2ve -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
