On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 8:44:06 PM, David R. Austen took a mike
and sang the following text:

> After writing to MaXxX I suddenly realized that it was very likely
> somebody would step in to protect MaXxX  . . . from my impertinent
> message. :-)

No offense taken, and had Allie not intervened on my behalf, I would
have done it myself the same way he did. Thanks, Allie :)

Personally, I myself almost set up a filter on "xxx", until one day I
started receiving messages originating from an old friend of mine, who,
believe it or not, had an account [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something like
that. Yes, all x'es. Some time later, I encountered hostnames containing
"xxx" but not having anything to do with any porn - heck, some of the
true XXX websites offer free email boxes, with xxx in the hostname
somewhere! And their customers should hardly expect being filtered out
wherever they write from their @somethingxxx.com addresses, should they?

My point is - your simple "xxx" rule can be largely expected to match
much more than it was supposed to :]

-- 
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.
 |\  /|      \~~~/     \~~~/   WWW: http://none :(
 | \/ |  /\   > <  \~/  > <    E-M: maxxx[at]rpg.pl
 |____| /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\   ICQ: 3146019
   
Flyin' high with The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
over the swamps of Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Dodatek Service Pack. 2


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 1.62b16 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to