> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website > > Feedback Even if the link is not correct (maybe it is correct with " around it, > > I don't know), TB! should react correctly, Outlook Express does it > > correctly.
> The bug is in the web page, the link is incorrect. Links cannot > contain blanks. > Let me quote from http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2368.txt (page 2, > 5. Encoding): [..] > Therefore, TB does it correctly, Outlook does it incorrectly. I see > absolutely not reason to ask TB to violate RFCs only because Outlook > does it and the web-designer doesn't know how to encode correctly. Actually you're partially correct. Yes, outlook is accepting the breaking of the RFCs, but with a slight change to the registry entry for mailto: handling, TB also handles it just right too. I think this topic came up on tbudl a while back, so searching in the archives over there will give you the solution. I think it was Marck (?) who pointed out that. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 1.63b6 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
