First of all, this is very strange. I cannot answer to Alexander's
<mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> by pressing reply, all I
get if I do is a blank editor window. No quotes, no to-address, no
nothing. I'm pretty sure it's not a broken template since my reply
template for this list is quite simple. It has never happened before,
but is true for this message as well as for the one I wrote in the
same thread.

And, furthermore, when trying to send what I am currently writing, I
get a popup saying "List index out of bounds (12)". I have tried
deleting the .tbi file and letting TB! recreate it, without any
success. I'll try inserting it all in a new message and see if I can
get it to the list.

Very strange.

Well, to the point:

MO>> While we're at it, what is best practice
> Allow 8 bit in headers - no
> 8bit characters treated as - without changes

After reading the thread and doing some testing, my choice would be to
stay with my current setting;

Allow 8 bit in headers - yes
8bit characters treated as - without changes

MO>>  to use and why?
> 8 bit in headers disallowed by RFC (yet)

OK, but how bad is it? I have used the above settings for at least a
year or two without noticing any problem. I'm usually a fan of
following the standards, but I did get complaint about unreadable
headers/from addresses when I did use the settings Alexander is
suggesting, but has never noticed any problems while using my current
settings.

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlstr�m

Using The Bat! v1.62/Beta7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 1.63b11 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to