Good [morning|afternoon|day|evening|night] Olivier, OM> Seeing how close to unusable it is for now, I wouldn't mind any longuer OM> beta period. As 2.0 is only at Beta/1, is it important anyway ? :)
..but we and other users waiting for the release version would really mind. Besides, I don't quite understand what you mean by being nearly unusable - it looks like you need to do some fine-tuning for your IMAP account and we should just make it possible :-) OM> My account is quite complex and heavy, a bit less than 100 folders OM> in a hierarchy. Well, I don't consider 100 folders as "heavy". I know TB! users with about a thousand of folders and nearly the same number of filters. This is what I would call "heavy" :-)) Though, it's not IMAP accounts, but nevertheless... OM> I'm LAN connected to my IMAP server but polling ALL folders just for OM> counts takes more than a minute. This speaks about your IMAP server performance, I am afraid. It could be the server retrieves folder status and processes other commands in the same thread and this is why you need multiple connections and which is basically wrong because IMAP server implementation should be based on "thin client" philosophy... OM> What would you recommend as synchronisation settings ? As long as you use it on LAN, you don't need to synchronise any folder - i.e. caching would work for you better. However, if you wish to keep an eye on some folders, you can synchronise headers for those folders, but bear in mind that the Beta/1 disconnects from the server after synchronisation is finished (this will be made optional in the next Beta). -- All the Best! Stefan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...One if by LAN, 2 if by C, 3 if by ERR.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.0b1 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
