-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu 7-Aug-03 9:48am -0400, Tamas Kardos wrote:
> Can someone confirm this? Do you have an example from this mailing list (just give us an MID)? It sure looks like C and E are improperly threaded. Did either of those messages have an In-Reply-To field? - -- Best regards, Bill The Bat! 2.00 Beta/1 is now 5 days old. - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) Comment: Bill McCarthy's GPG Signature iD8DBQE/MpxQto6P8brTvEMRAjdmAJ0YjYlZiCMU4Cl6jX3tMqORBqnn0wCgoLE8 OCtfw+alztu/6s7gZ/ip+VE= =x0o8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.0b1 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
