Hi Dierk

 On Sunday, August 17, 2003 1:49:17 PM you wrote:

> Good question. I gather, bad marketing combined with a medical
> doctor's attitude towards pregnancy.

Why always the word "marketing"?

> Again, good question. The answer is much more satisfying than the
> first one: RITLabs is a very small company; it seems they didn't find
> the time to write up the upgrade policy and publish it.

No please.

> Honestly, perhaps there is a small group of people RITLabs consider to
> be, lets call it "the inner circle", and maybe I am part of it.

I understand.

> Back to the matter at hand. If there is such an inner circle, where is
> the problem?

Seems you don't understand.

> Don't get me wrong, I don't know the answers myself, and perhaps I
> couldn't tell you *if* I knew. The only useful advice I have is, sort
> out your alternatives to your liking and go with it. You can use v2b1,
> v1.63, v2b2 with nag screen, whatever suits you.

Yes of course - I could use also Windows 95...

Well - history seems to have the habit of repeating itself. Quite a
similar "story" I saw with an other software - two, three years ago. I
think nobody uses it today...

--
 Best regards,
   Martin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 TheBat! 2.0 Beta/1 on Windows 2000 5 2195 Service Pack 2


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 2.0b2 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to