Allie Martin wrote: KC> Perhaps my opinion is weighted, but GnuPG support seems more KC> important to me than GUI enhancements to The Bat! With completely KC> functional PGP support I think The Bat! would stand at the top of KC> the Windows based MUAs. Unless I'm incorrect, GnuPG support could KC> be used in a business environment and seems like quite marketable KC> inexpensive security solution. S/MIME support, PGP support, KC> security from OE HTML type vulnerabilities ... sounds sweet to me. KC> The PGP support seems .. oh so close ... I just wish that it could KC> get finished.
I guess you're right on that.
The issues you mentioned weren't really that important to me in the
past since I did not have a revoked key, and PGP/MIME was not yet
implemented. I would therefore use GPG Tray to assist with the areas
where things weren't working so well. Now that PGP/MIME is around, I
wish to sign, encrypt etc. on sending. GPG Tray will not help with
PGP/MIME. The integrated GnuPG support has to work really well now.
It's much better to present a dialog presenting the possible choices.
Smartmatching can choose the more likely key, but the possibility to
choose, and override any choices based on smart-martching, should
always be available to the user.
--
-=allie_M=- | List Moderator
PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
___________________________________
Using TB! v2.02 CE RC2 � WinXP Pro SP1
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.02 CE RC2 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
