Hello ken,

Sunday, April 18, 2004, 3:03:09 AM, you wrote:


kg> True, it could be worse.  And yes, RitLabs does seem to work hard at
kg> getting releases out.  I'd sure love to read some definitive answers
kg> to IMAP - not necessarily fixes - just a commitment to what is being
kg> addressed, what the priority is, the direction of IMAP development,
kg> etc.

I have been following the entire beta series, though I didn't download
each and every update, I am now on the new release 2.10.01 ( at least I
THINK it is the newest, you have to be QUICK these days;)
I also tried to work with the IMAP accounts, got toally frustrated and
dumped my IMAP account ( it was free) and just use POP3 now. If it had
been put to a vote, I would have FOR SURE voted for better IMAP support
before adding virtual folders.
FOR MY PERSONAL NEEDS ( my opinion here:) I would rather have TB work
with IMAP than to add and monkey around with some concept like Virtual
folders. And I second your comments about that issue.

-- 
Best regards,
 Paul  
Using The Bat! v2.10.01 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Mar2004 (4.1.357)  (avast! version number)
0416-3 (17.04.2004) (avast! DB version number)
4.1.357 (avast! plugin version number)                          


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to