Hello Zeflash,

On Mon, 3 May 2004 14:38:33 +0200 GMT (03/05/2004, 19:38 +0700 GMT),
Zeflash wrote:

Z> OK. I didn't know my mail would trigger such a general debate about
Z> the position of TheBat in the mail industry :)

We're a philosophical bunch when there are no betas to dissect. ;-)

Z> I'll recenter the subject to the problem at hand: the memory leak.
Z> Is this forum monitored by the developers at RitLabs? is this going to
Z> be taken in account for future releases?

Some of the developers read this list. However, to get an issue fixed
it usually helps better to add bugnotes to a bugreport.

Z> I take from some replies that the issue fixing process isn't something
Z> very reliable. Although a leak as someone pointed out is something
Z> that *shouldn't* be in a released product. It's just wrong.

I agree with you here.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

I know you think you understood what I said, but what you heard was
not what I meant.

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.10.01
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM



________________________________________________________
 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to